BSV Forum - General - Episode Discussions

Tabula Rasa: Episode Discussion

Dec 15 2008 04:33 pm   #1sosa lola

- Yeesh, Buffy's attitude is annoying here, I guess she hated that she made things more complicated with Spike when she wanted them to just be talking buddies. She's regretting that she kissed him… and I think she's ashamed with herself for doing it. While she is attracted to him physically, she doesn't want to consider him as romantic partner.

- I wonder what the significance of kittens in demon world. How is Shark Guy able to buy a house in Bel Air with a swimming pool using kittens?

- Aw, Buffy went to Spike's rescue, and Spike seized the opportunity to run away. :D

- ANYA: Do you think she ... walked around on clouds, wearing like ... Birkenstocks and played a harp? 'Cause those are just not flattering. You know, the clonky sandals, not a harp. (softly) I mean, who ... doesn't look good with a harp?
The others just look at her. They all look grim.

I think they wanted to smack her, I think I would've, too. "We snatched her from heaven, idiot. Doesn't matter how heaven was like. Bottom line is we were selfish jerks." This is what they were probably thinking about.

- ANYA: What? I'm just saying what everyone's thinking, (to Xander) right baby?
XANDER: You are attractive and have many good qualities.

Ouch, Xander! Yes, she can be stupid, but that was mean.

- TARA: It's totally not stupid to wonder what it was like for Buffy. But it could have been any one of a zillion heavenly dimensions. All we know is that ... it was a good place and she was happy there.

See, Xander, Tara was able to point Anya to the issue at hand without insulting her. 

- Seeing Willow the Mighty so down and hating herself after episodes of her being so full of herself is a refreshing change. I love how she went from "We were selfish" to "I was selfish." She knows she's more at fault than any of them since she had manipulated and lied to them to get them to help her.

- Xander, Tara and Anya have a point. What's done is done, wallowing in what they had done wouldn't help, they should focus on making things better for Buffy.

- Willow has always been a helpful person, doing all she can to make others happy, to fix the problems. It's a characteristic in her since high school years, and her goal to fix and help others got easier to accomplish when she grew stronger as a witch. Now it became an obsession, helping others makes her feel happy about herself, makes her realize how strong and great she is. A feeling she rarely had when she had been a high school loser. She started to neglect computers and the "hard way" to reach the goal because those were the values of Loser Willow. Magic gives her confidence and strength, it makes her the new Willow. Buffy's equal instead of her sidekick. Magic makes her feel special, to the point where helping others became selfish instead of selfless, because now Willow helps others to make herself feel happy that she did this amazing thing. It makes her feel like a hero. This is why doing decorations in Xanya's party was more about making Willow feel happy and useful than making Anya happy.

- WILLOW: Tara, I didn't mean to-
TARA: To what? Violate my mind like that? How could you, Willow? How could you after what Glory did to me?
WILLOW: Violate you? I ... I-I didn't ... mean anything like that, I-I, I just wanted us not to fight any more. I love you.

That's what I've been arguing about in early discussions. Willow's intentions weren't dark. She was selfish and lazy, sure, but she didn't intend to hurt Tara by doing what she did. She just wanted them to be happy. That doesn't mean that what she did was "okay", she had done a great mistake and Tara calls her on it:

TARA: If you don't wanna fight, you don't fight. You don't use magic to make a fight disappear.
WILLOW: But I-I just wanted to make things better. Better for us.
TARA: But you don't get to decide what is better for us, Will. We're in a relationship, we are supposed to decide together.

- I understand where Giles is coming from, he had told Buffy more than once to deal with her responsibilities like an adult, and Buffy never listened, still kept throwing them on Giles' shoulders. Giles wants Buffy to learn how to be an adult, and him staying would make it impossible, because Buffy will still dump her responsibilities on him and he's too weak to refuse helping her. I think what scared him is that if he stuck around longer, it'll be way more difficult for him to leave. He's gotta put down his foot and do what's best for Buffy to teach her how to handle real life.

- GILES: I've taught you all I can about being a slayer, and your mother taught you what you needed to know about life.

While Giles did teach Buffy about being a slayer, I'm not sure Joyce made Buffy ready for real life. Joyce had always supported Buffy with money and an open home whenever Buffy felt like coming back. Some parents have their children pay rent after they become 18 to teach them responsibility, and while Buffy came back to live with her mother, Joyce didn't ask her for rent. It's probably because they got so much going on with Glory, Dawn's keyness and Joyce's illness that it felt too much asking Buffy to get a part-time job to pay Joyce rent.

- I wish I have Willow's magic just to use it after I take a shower. It's great to just point a finger and in a second be all dried up, dressed and have your hair whatever style you like.

- I have a feeling that if Tara hadn't implied earlier that she wanted a break up, Willow wouldn't have felt too desperate to get things fixed, hence using magic. She's too blind to realize that she's hurting their relationship with it instead of fixing the situation. Her desire to have everyone happy and miserable-less is getting ahead of her rationality. I think she wants those who are upset with her to feel good about her again, she had hurt both Buffy and Tara, and by making them forget what she had done to them, they won't be upset with her anymore.

- So cute to see Anya and Tara thumb wrestling. :D

- Doesn't Spike look adorkable with his old-fashioned brown suit with a bow-tie, and a padded hat with earflaps. *hugs him*

- SPIKE: You need to give me asylum.
XANDER: I'll say.
SPIKE: No need to get cute.

Hee!

- Everybody is upset about Giles leaving, except for Anya who's finally gonna get the shop to herself and Spike who doesn't care.

- BUFFY: Sorry. Everybody's sorry. I know that you guys are just trying to help ... but it's just, it's too much. And, and I, I can't take it any more. If you guys ... if you guys understood how it felt ... how it feels. It's like I'm dying, it-

How much it sucks that when Buffy started to open up, the spell begins its effect.

- Look at the contrasts: Anya, who was desperately wishing for Giles to leave, doesn't want him to leave anymore because they're engaged. Xander, who barely noticed Willow in high school, finds her attractive now, and Willow, who used to have this major crush on Xander, doesn't find him appealing anymore.

- Another contrast: Notice how Xander and Willow are taking the vampire existence here differently from when they first learned about them in S1. In The Harvest, Willow appeared like a frightened mouse, unable to keep it together. Xander, on the other hand, doesn't show fear at all, too occupied thinking of rescuing Jesse, and with foolish bravery follows Buffy to where the vampires are. In Tabula Rasa, Willow handles the vampires' existence much better than she did in S1 while Xander passes out with fear. I wonder if the fact that Jesse had been kidnapped in S1 had everything to do with Xander's ability to deal with vampires' existence with such calmness. His loyalty, protectiveness and love for his friends are the key to his courage.

- Personal Note: I know how popular this episode is, but I have to say that it's too overrated. I had high expectations for this episode, but was too disappointed when watching it. Other than Randy/Rupert/Enya –which was brilliant and unexpected- everything else is just too fanficcy predictable and cringe-worthy.

For example, Dawn saying "I don't think I drink" because she's a teenager. Like she psychically knew she was underage.

And Tara thinking Willow's name is cute, get it? Because they're in love, so it's only logical that Tara will find Willow's name to be pretty.

And Buffy finding out Dawn's real name because she's wearing a necklace called "Dawn." Yeah, I get it, it's an attempt to make Buffy and Spike the only ones who don't know their real names. I find it lame. 

And my most cringe-worthy moment was Buffy and Dawn figuring out they were sisters because they fought. Give me a break.

- Moving on:

XANDER: Yeah, 'cause I thought you were a girl and I'd remember, but...
WILLOW: (grabs her breasts) Well, I am a girl!

This one is actually funny because it implies that Willow is the stronger partner in her relationship with Tara which stereotypically makes her the "man" of the relationship, hence "I thought you were a girl." "I AM a girl." It also shows when she offers her arm to Xander –which is the boyfriend gesture- before she corrects herself and takes his own offered arm.

- I have to repeat that Spike, Giles and Anya are the ones that made the episode. Their situation is SO wrong it's really funny and enjoyable. It's the most amusing one out of all situations, which were too dull and predictable. Xander/Willow? Already done. Buffy/Dawn? Nothing new.

- I want to quote ALL the Giles/Spike lines, they're just so quotable! Okay, I'll choose only one:

GILES: You're not too old to put across my knee, you know ... sonny. (And Spike smiles at that. LOL!!)

- Buffy without her memories jumps to save Spike just like she did when she still had them in the beginning of the episode.

- Aww, that father/son moment between Giles and Spike. Adorable!

- Another thing that annoys me about the episode is how they handled Spike's vampire nature. This is one of the reasons I've enjoyed Spin the Bottle in AtS more than Tabula Rasa. I think the way they dealt with Angel's situation as a vampire was much more interesting and real than they did with Spike's in Tabula Rasa. Good or not, Spike is a vampire. When trapped in a shop with humans, he must feel some vampire urge to bite and drink from them. It's an instinct. It has nothing to do with him being good or bad. Angel still felt like a vampire and was too conflicted about these weird feelings he's having, it was twice funnier and more realistic.

- Poor Anya, even with lost memories, her fiancé wants to leave her. ;)

- Rupy? Now I found a nickname that makes me wanna throw up more than Willow's "baby"s when addressing Tara. :D

- They kinda overdid it with the Willow/Tara sexual tension just to have Willow say "I think I'm gay" line.

- Coward Xander finds his bravery and kicks some vampire ass while Willow and Tara are busy staring into each other's eyes. Thank God Alex has Umad or the vampire would have killed him without his "girlfriend" and Tara noticing.

- Poor Dawn, watching her "parents" break up. I really like the metaphor of Willow and Tara being Dawn's parents, I like how it carried on throughout the season. Willow even mentions it in S8 "Anywhere but Here."

- Spike came to comfort Buffy and she looked away, then we see her kissing him. I think at first, she was trying to keep her solid stance, but then her sorrow over Giles leaving left her numb that she needed to "feel" again.

- This is probably the hottest Spuffy kiss in the whole show.
 

Dec 15 2008 05:50 pm   #2Scarlet Ibis
Everybody is upset about Giles leaving, except for Anya who's finally gonna get the shop to herself and Spike who doesn't care.
I don't know--Spike looked...I think the word I'm looking for is either dismayed or disappointed when Giles is speaking.  He definitely didn't look indifferent.  I think Anya was the only one who was excited about it.

For example, Dawn saying "I don't think I drink" because she's a teenager. Like she psychically knew she was underage.
Well, this is a situation where you don't know who are, but you remember other things--numbers, vampires (fictitious or otherwise here), whatever.  I'm guessing if you were a drinker, there'd be a sensory knowledge about it.  Like with Randy and Joan fighting--everything doesn't just go away.

Buffy without her memories jumps to save Spike just like she did when she still had them in the beginning of the episode.
Here's what I found most interesting about this ep--not only does she just jump in to save him, she doesn't bother to take action, to save herself, before "Randy" is in danger.  Also, she likes to curse, for some reason :P 

Her plan is to keep Randy safe with her.  Anya stays to protect the money, and Giles stays with Anya, and the rest disperse.  Typically in a situation where you're being attacked, even if it's just one person in the group, the best thing would be to stay together, and not split up and become easier targets, even if one is wicked strong.  I thought that was interesting as well--a far cry from the whole "What can't we do if we're together" hoopla.

When trapped in a shop with humans, he must feel some vampire urge to bite and drink from them. It's an instinct. It has nothing to do with him being good or bad. Angel still felt like a vampire and was too conflicted about these weird feelings he's having, it was twice funnier and more realistic.
No, not really.  Angel (well, Liam rather) only had the urge to drink--hell, it wasn't even the urge to drink.  He was looking at Cordy's breasts, and got excited.  That was probably when he noticed her blood pumping, and shifted to game face.  Spike too did not have the urge to drink, and only shifted in the form of excitement--excitement for the fight (and winning, being a "super hero" and all).  Also, having the urge to drink?  My guess goes to actually being hungry.  Neither were hungry.  And neither "felt" like a vampire.  Angel only acted out because the others were so quick to crucify him.  Randy only did the opposite (not being all "Aarrgh!  I'm a vampire fear me!) because he liked/respected Joan.  The "Chase Girl" on the other and was a total bitch, and Liam only was interested in physical needs anyway.  Randy starts out making this sarcastic response about Joan "fancying herself being the boss," and then does exactly what she tells him to.

*I'm recalling this bit from memory*

Randy: (sarcastically) That's your plan?
Joan: (sure of herself) Yeah.
Randy: (acquiesces) Right then.

ETA: Also, if we're talking about reallism, Buffy's slayer side would have automatically viewed Spike as a threat, and not tried to protect him, or felt comfortable with him fighting at her back once she knew he was a vampire.

Spike came to comfort Buffy and she looked away, then we see her kissing him. I think at first, she was trying to keep her solid stance, but then her sorrow over Giles leaving left her numb that she needed to "feel" again.
I disagree.  It was Spike being all "sod this" and walking away.  She had to get up off her ass to go after him for a change.  She expected him to just sit around, even if she was ignoring him.  And when he didn't, that spurred her into action to keep him there.  Which is retarded, considering her response in the next ep...but I'll wait.

Also, overall in season six, which for me was much of a downer, no scratch that--when I first saw this ep, I enjoyed it immensely, and it's still one of my favorites.  However, I will agree that "Spin the Bottle" was a better version of "group memory loss."
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 15 2008 06:40 pm   #3nmcil
- Another thing that annoys me about the episode is how they handled Spike's vampire nature. This is one of the reasons I've enjoyed Spin the Bottle in AtS more than Tabula Rasa. I think the way they dealt with Angel's situation as a vampire was much more interesting and real than they did with Spike's in Tabula Rasa. Good or not, Spike is a vampire. When trapped in a shop with humans, he must feel some vampire urge to bite and drink from them. It's an instinct. It has nothing to do with him being good or bad. Angel still felt like a vampire and was too conflicted about these weird feelings he's having, it was twice funnier and more realistic.

While this might be more logical - I think that the point and theme of the episode was the fantasy of making a New Slate-Tabula Rasa.  Willow, with her magical control wants to wipe the slate clean and make Tara and their relationship easy.   Plus she wants  Buffy's Pain and Willow's complicity in that pain to  have the "easy fix."   I personally do not think that Willow's motivation is trying to help and bring less pain and sorrow to her friends, I tjink it is based on wanting to control other people and the parameters of her own existence.  Tara has it right on this one.

Spike's treatment, while not strictly logical, does allow for all the comedy.  If the writers had dealt with the normal vampire and slayer physical parameters, Buffy would also have had to sense not only all the other vamps, but Spike as well.  We would have had a much different episode and I think one that would not have served the comedy-dark side of magic that was needed for the Buffy season arc. 

You bring up excellent points about Xander's changes - Willow's magic, while not intended to  control and harm anyone, hurts everyone around her.  Coward Xander, IMO, is more about his personality, his fears and insecurity that take the forefront.  His first important scene, I thought was wonderful, especially when he chants the ohm.  Spike's lines about his being equal to Buffy; a vampire souled and on a mission, while treated as comedy, is central to his journey and his relationship  with Buffy - he wants to be her equal and have a real relationship with her.  Sure, it was an easy joke, but it still speaks to a vital part of Spike's arc and the Buffy-Spike relationship.  Spike's "tabula rasa" is his deep desires come to life - He wants to be a part of Buffy's life and have her see him as more than just a vampire.  Buffy's self-chosen name, is an obvious cliche, but again, it fits perfectly into her arc of having to be back on earth and being The Slayer. 

I totally agree with you, Giles, Spike and Anya were great in this episode, they "made the episode" for me as well - along with Xander's first big scene.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 15 2008 08:22 pm   #4Eowyn315
How is Shark Guy able to buy a house in Bel Air with a swimming pool using kittens?
Uh... they're tasty? Presumably, certain demons would pay a lot of money for them. I mean, I don't think they gamble for kittens because they're cute - they do it because kittens have a lot of value. Maybe they're some kind of demon delicacy.

Seeing Willow the Mighty so down and hating herself after episodes of her being so full of herself is a refreshing change.
Yeah... shame she doesn't actually learn anything from this. She realizes she totally screwed up, and then decides to fix it by making the exact same mistakes all over again.

I think the word I'm looking for is either dismayed or disappointed when Giles is speaking. He definitely didn't look indifferent.
I could see Spike not caring personally, but he would know what it would mean for Buffy, and so he's probably dismayed on her behalf.

I'm guessing if you were a drinker, there'd be a sensory knowledge about it.
Buffy's underage, too (she's 20 until "Older and Far Away" ), but she doesn't seem to have any "psychic knowledge" of it, so I'd say it's more the sensory thing as well.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 16 2008 03:26 am   #5Spikez_tart
 I wonder what the significance of kittens in demon world - tender and tasty.  Yum.

I found Giles' remarks about Spike interesting  "And you do inspire a, um ... particular feeling of ... familiarity and ... disappointment."  Why would Giles be disappointed in Spike?  He basically told him to go to hell in OMWF - "I'll never want your opinion."  So why the big change?

I love this episode, with all faults, I guess because while the gang doesn't have their memories, it's like a fresh breeze blew through and carried away all the crankiness.  (Crankiness to be resumed immediately at spell's end.)  Not to mention Spike's cap. 
If we want her to be exactly she'll never be exactly I know the only really real Buffy is really Buffy and she's gone' who?
Dec 16 2008 03:41 am   #6Scarlet Ibis
I found Giles' remarks about Spike interesting "And you do inspire a, um ... particular feeling of ... familiarity and ... disappointment."
I always thought this referred to Giles thinking Spike not using all of his potential.  But then he goes on to claim Spike as family ("Older brother?" ), and then Spike trumps it by referring to him as "father."  Now why this may make some kind of general sense, since they're the only two British.  But the Americans (excluding Buffy and Dawn), didn't have this feeling of "kinship."  I think it's great that they have some kind of connection with one another :)
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 16 2008 04:51 am   #7nmcil
I loved the way that Giles and Spike assume that they are related  particularly since Giles really does despise Spike - The being disappointed I associated with Spike immediately rejecting Giles comments:

GILES: Um, thinking about your affliction and, uh, your newfound discovery that you can fight only demons; it occurs to me that (chuckling) I realize this is completely against your nature but I-I-I-- Has it occurred to you that there may be a higher purpose--  (The "I" in Team) 

Plus once having actually lived Spike I would think that Giles had a better perspective on Spike and his intelligence and education.  Spike does not get the "dumb down" treatment until later.  One thing that I like so much about this episode is that behind all the comedy the audience always knows what the reality of their relationships are and what comes in their future.  Giles and Spike being father and son and hugging is both a lovely moment and very sad.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 16 2008 05:32 am   #8Scarlet Ibis
I loved the way that Giles and Spike assume that they are related particularly since Giles really does despise Spike
I don't think Giles despises Spike.  Especially then.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 16 2008 06:08 am   #9nmcil
I don't think Giles despises Spike. Especially then.

What would be a good word to describe how Giles feels about Spike in general -

to despise someone is to have an intense dislike for a person or a thing and to have contempt for a person.   I would not use hate, Xander might hate Spike, but Giles felt something different, a lot more layered than  hatred.   While Giles may tolerate having Spike around, use him when necessary and to effect a wanted goal, he does not like Spike.  

My closest analogy would be how I feel about GWB, I would say that I despise him - but it is founded on how he treats people and his world view.  What are the motivating factors for how Giles reacts to and perceives Spike?
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 16 2008 06:35 am   #10Scarlet Ibis
I would not use hate, Xander might hate Spike, but Giles felt something different, a lot more layered than hatred.
I still disagree.  Even Xander (who I think only vehemently dislikes Spike--at times, and not always).  In "Bargaining," we see Spike and Giles joking around.  Even before the changes of season six, I wouldn't say that Giles despised Spike (post "Crush" perhaps, but he got over it).  Despise, like hate, are two incredibly strong words, and I don't see them applying here.   If you despise someone, you wouldn't let them live with you.  You wouldn't joke with them.  If you hate someone--really hate someone, you wouldn't invite them to your wedding.  You wouldn't help them when they need it, fight by their sides, or save their lives.  Giles and Xander have done these things for Spike.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 16 2008 09:54 am   #11nmcil
Well, I guess that I am letting myself see more of the bad things that happen between the two characters than the good things - and I am glad that you made me think about them again.   I will have to find a better way to describe their relationship. 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 16 2008 12:01 pm   #12sosa lola

ETA: Also, if we're talking about reallism, Buffy's slayer side would have automatically viewed Spike as a threat, and not tried to protect him, or felt comfortable with him fighting at her back once she knew he was a vampire.

I guess the reason why this episode didn't touch obvious aspects -Buffy feeling her spider sense around Spike and Spike having vampire urges and desires- is because it's a comedy episode. They already have the Willow/Tara and Giles/Buffy drama to deal with.

Also, overall in season six, which for me was much of a downer, no scratch that--when I first saw this ep, I enjoyed it immensely, and it's still one of my favorites. However, I will agree that "Spin the Bottle" was a better version of "group memory loss."

Perhaps because I had high expectations for the episode, it came out disappointing. But then I had high expectations for Once More with Feeling and it didn't disappoint. Spin the Bottle was much better written IMO.

Yeah... shame she doesn't actually learn anything from this. She realizes she totally screwed up, and then decides to fix it by making the exact same mistakes all over again.

Willow seems to be blaming herself and not magic for what she had done to Buffy. She still thinks that magic can solve everything. Once we get more into the drug-metaphor, she'll realize that her use of magic is the problem.

Well, I guess that I am letting myself see more of the bad things that happen between the two characters than the good things - and I am glad that you made me think about them again. I will have to find a better way to describe their relationship.

I think what Xander and Giles feel toward Spike is dislike and inability to get along, same goes for Spike toward them. Not to mention the lack of soul and the fact that Giles and Xander aren't sure if Spike would still care after he loses his chip (obviously, Xander doesn't trust Spike fully from his conversation in Seeing Red) I do, however, believe that they can be friends when put in the right situation. Xander and Spike could have developed one in S7 if the writers had more screen time.
 

Dec 16 2008 07:17 pm   #13nmcil
Not sure that a comparison between "Spin The Bottle" and "Tabula Rasa" is productive.  The theme may be the same, but the arcs were different.  While memory loss and magic are important in "Tabula Rasa," that is not the primary story that is being explored - It is Willow's actions and how the effect her relationships, her desire  to control what is happening in the Scooby world.  Plus we have the continuing arc of Buffy and Spike and the consequences of her resurrection. The loss of their memories is an interesting and excellent way to advance their season story lines, but, IMO, is secondary to themes of control, hidden fears, and emotional trauma. 

It has been a long time since I watched "Spin the Bottle" and will watch it today - it would be interesting to discuss the differences between the episodes.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 16 2008 08:03 pm   #14Eowyn315
Now why this may make some kind of general sense, since they're the only two British. But the Americans (excluding Buffy and Dawn), didn't have this feeling of "kinship."
Well, I do think their primary reason for assuming they're related is that they're both British (when everyone else is obviously American). So it's not that Giles feels a kinship for Spike; it's just that he has certain feelings toward Spike, and he assumes the reasons for those feelings are because they're related. But there are plenty of reasons to feel a sense of familiarity and disappointment toward someone that don't have to do with family. I'm sure they all felt some degree of familiarity for each other - why else would they trust total strangers so quickly? It's just that most of those feelings weren't really explored.

Look at Willow and Xander, for example. Willow's wearing a jacket with his last name, and his first assumption is, "Maybe I have a brother and you go out with him." Now, the logical assumption would be that they are dating each other, but Xander might have been feeling a sense of friendship or familial closeness and not sexual attraction to Willow, which made him think of a brother's girlfriend. None of that is discussed, since there's really no time for them to go around talking about their instinctive feelings toward one another (unless it's funny), and for the most part they go with context clues over feelings. But Buffy and Dawn figure out their relationship, as do Willow and Tara, so maybe if they'd just spent enough time together as a group, the others would have paid more attention to their instincts (like, for example, Xander and Anya might have realized they were paired with the wrong people, or Giles would have felt fatherly toward Buffy). But that wouldn't be nearly as funny as Anya being Giles' fiancee and Spike's tarty stepmom-to-be.

What would be a good word to describe how Giles feels about Spike in general
I think it varies. At times, dislike. Annoyance, perhaps. Rarely despise, unless provoked. But there are other times when it verges on reluctant friendship. By this point in season six, I'd say it's mainly tolerance. He doesn't particularly care for Spike, but he doesn't seem to mind him being around.

Once we get more into the drug-metaphor, she'll realize that her use of magic is the problem.
Uh... I think you mean, "She'll stop taking responsibility for her actions and blame the magic when it's the user who's at fault." :) She was right to blame herself for bringing Buffy back. Once she starts blaming magic for her problems, then she doesn't have to feel guilty - it's not her fault, it's the magic's fault.

But this isn't a new thing. Willow has been turning to magic to solve her problems - with disastrous results - since season three. You'd think she'd see a pattern by now, and you'd think she'd see how Buffy's resurrection fits into that pattern. But not only doesn't she see that, she continues to maintain the pattern in trying to solve the problems previous magic use has caused.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 16 2008 08:47 pm   #15sosa lola

She was right to blame herself for bringing Buffy back. Once she starts blaming magic for her problems, then she doesn't have to feel guilty - it's not her fault, it's the magic's fault.

I understand why she started to think that way seeing as everybody around her seems to be blaming magic. Willow had gotten the right idea at first but then when writers and characters started treating magic like a drug, it made it seem like Willow was off the hook. I wish instead of Tara saying, "You're using too much magic," she said, "You're abusing magic" or "You're using magic irresponsibly."

I also disliked how Anya was viewed as the villain in Older and Far Away when she demanded Willow to get them out. Tara, and Spike as well, appeared annoyed with her suggestion. Everybody was treating magic like it was the real problem, when the real problem was Willow.

Willow has been turning to magic to solve her problems - with disastrous results - since season three. You'd think she'd see a pattern by now, and you'd think she'd see how Buffy's resurrection fits into that pattern. But not only doesn't she see that, she continues to maintain the pattern in trying to solve the problems previous magic use has caused.

You don't really see the problem until it bites you in the ass. Kinda like Xander who understood Buffy's feelings regarding Angel when he experienced it with Anya in Selfless.
Dec 17 2008 03:51 am   #16Eowyn315
I wish instead of Tara saying, "You're using too much magic," she said, "You're abusing magic" or "You're using magic irresponsibly."
Eh, that doesn't really bother me, because Tara's not implying that magic itself is bad. I mean, she obviously uses magic herself, and she doesn't have a problem with that, so she's still making it about Willow's judgment and not some inherently bad thing that Willow's gotten into. She's saying that magic - like most things - is fine in moderation, but in excess is bad news.

It's really Amy who first treats magic like a drug, since she has a "dealer" and acts like a junkie, going through withdrawal and stealing stuff from Buffy's house. And then, all of a sudden, it's not Willow's judgment that's in question - because how can you really blame an addict for craving a fix? It's the magic that's bad, and Willow has no control over it. It's a complete reversal of the entire preceding series, in which Willow has used magic to control various aspects of her - and others' - lives.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 19 2008 03:16 am   #17nmcil
Another thing that I think is an important part of Willow and Magic Addiction - is the simple fact that the issues of addiction are rampant in our societies.  Joss Whedon and his writers wanted the series to be something that would leave the viewers with a sense of our real life problems.  I am sure that most of us know friends and loved ones that have become addict to drugs or alcohol.  Hell, even being addicted to in Internet has become a problem in our real life.  

I felt that their solution for the finale of that arc was not particularly strong - and it was a nice thing to have a normal human Scooby be the hero for a change.  Still, considering what she does, it felt a little like another instance of a Scooby Free Card from consequences.  Have to say that Darth Willow made for a great BB - and that absorption of black magics out of the books was so splendid.  
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 19 2008 10:51 am   #18sosa lola

Still, considering what she does, it felt a little like another instance of a Scooby Free Card from consequences.

I'm not sure what the right solution is though. I think the Scoobies did fine with Willow, when it seemed like there was no chance of saving her, Buffy fought her (probably would have killed her if necessary.) But Willow was able to be reached, and obviously can be easily redeemed. Giles took her to the coven and helped her control the magic inside her, and we've all seen the guilt and remorse she felt. It wasn't the right time for her to go back to Sunnydale, but she was needed. And she was reminded of what she had done by many including Anya and Andrew.

I keep hearing about this Free Card thing directed to the Scoobies, but never really understood it. Almost all characters had been forgiven one time after another for what they had done in the show, not just the Scoobies. And the Scoobies had suffered the consequences of their actions at times: Willow lost Tara for her ignorance, Xander never got a second chance with Anya and Cordelia after he had hurt them, Giles was fired from the council for helping Buffy, and Buffy got kicked out of her house for being a lousy leader.
 

Dec 19 2008 04:45 pm   #19Scarlet Ibis
And the Scoobies had suffered the consequences of their actions at times: Willow lost Tara for her ignorance, Xander never got a second chance with Anya and Cordelia after he had hurt them, Giles was fired from the council for helping Buffy, and Buffy got kicked out of her house for being a lousy leader.
Well, Tara forgave Willow prematurely, so she really wasn't gone for good until she was killed.    Xander did get a second chance with Anya, but she too was killed before anything more could come of it (I'm seeing a pattern, here).  Xander and Cordelia do make amends, even though they don't stay together. Giles was rehired--retroactively.  And really, his relationship with Buffy didn't change in the least when he was fired.  Also, he was still getting a check from Sunnydale High anyway.  And as for Buffy, well, she wasn't a lousy leader, just made a wrong call on how to go about things (also, being kicked out of your own house by people don't really live there was the most ridiculous thing ever).  It lasted all of two days anyway.  I'd say that was more of an embarrassment than a punishment.  That, and some good and valid points were made before she was sent packing.  However, I still think they should have left as opposed to kicking her out.

As for Willow, yeah, she got control of her magic by going to the coven and everything, but why is it that no one expected her to go to jail like Faith did/was expected to?  I think the thing of it is--the whole "get out of jail free card" thing (which is literal in Willow's case)--is that the Scoobies seem to have lesser consequences on the scale than the non/second string Scoobies.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 19 2008 05:13 pm   #20nmcil
oh I totally agree with the payment in Karma - my only concern, and it is one that is separate from the story and the needed parameters for great story telling - that for many viewers it felt that they were not having to face real world consequences for their deeds.  Anya does not die, accept in the possible Karma scenario, as the consequence of Xander's OMWF spell.  Fact is, that to tell their great stories, there had to be a separation from the real world normality.  It was the emotional life and social development of young people and their older care givers that the series was founded on.  

The Buffyverse connected so powerfully with the viewers because it was about the emotional and social patterns that did apply to all the viewers.  Xander's fear and insecurities were something that all the viewers understood - Anya's immense pain from his leaving her on her "happiest day of my life," is what connected with the audience.  Anya does get the direct punishment/consequences from her victim - Xander however is never faced with the death's he caused.  Is it important to the story telling that Xander's spell casting be addressed and have responsibility and consequences i.e., legal ramifications - no,   Does it leave a "sour taste" and sense of "he got a Free Card" out of causing the deaths of people, Yes, it does to this viewer.

Living in todays world, and all the HUGE REAL LIFE FREE CARDS that many of our government and business leaders are getting - Xander's no consequences seem to fit right in with our society too. 

Everyone has their own perspective and interpretations of the series, mine has tended toward the social implications for our real world and the multi-layered metaphors and mythic themes. 

” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 19 2008 08:23 pm   #21sosa lola
Well, Tara forgave Willow prematurely, so she really wasn't gone for good until she was killed. Xander did get a second chance with Anya, but she too was killed before anything more could come of it (I'm seeing a pattern, here). Xander and Cordelia do make amends, even though they don't stay together. Giles was rehired--retroactively. And really, his relationship with Buffy didn't change in the least when he was fired. Also, he was still getting a check from Sunnydale High anyway.

Bottom line is: They were punished for what they had done. Besides, it turned out well to all the characters in the end, not just the Scoobies.

And as for Buffy, well, she wasn't a lousy leader, just made a wrong call on how to go about things

I do think she was a lousy leader, but we'll discuss this when we get to S7. :)

but why is it that no one expected her to go to jail like Faith did/was expected to?

Faith wasn't expected to go to jail. Everybody wanted to help her, but she was too freaked out to notice. Faith would have gotten the same treatment as Willow if she hadn't kept betraying the Scoobies one time after another. Willow, on the other hand, learned from what she had done and worked on getting better.

Xander however is never faced with the death's he caused.

While I agree that I would've loved seeing Xander get yelled at for being an idiot, just like in BB&B when Giles got cross with him and Willow stopped talking to him for a while, I think the difference between him and Anya is that he hadn't intended to kill anyone while Anya did. Her past bit her in the ass because she intended to hurt that man she had cursed. Xander only wanted answers to his fears. But that will raise the question of do intentions count in such situations or not?

Perhaps losing his eye is a long due punishment for casting the spell? I heard he would need both eyes to keep working in construction, so that's gonna suck badly, because being a construction worker is the only thing he was ever good at.
Dec 19 2008 08:59 pm   #22Scarlet Ibis
Perhaps losing his eye is a long due punishment for casting the spell?
I think what everyone was getting at was direct cause and effect, not consequences presumably from karma (which may not be the case at all--since it's never mentioned, I'm inclined to think no).  So in that sense, the Scoobies were not punished directly for what they had done, whereas the others were, and they usually sought penance in some form or fashion, and of their own volition (Faith, Spike, Anya, Angel, Wesley, Gunn, Jonathan).

As for Faith, Buffy expected her to go to jail (on AtS), and she did for years.  She killed one guy on accident, some harmless demons, beat up a bunch of innocent people really badly, and killed that old man on purpose.  Willow killed Warren, I'm not sure if she killed Rack or not, but then she attempted to murder Andrew, Jonathan, Buffy, Dawn, Giles, Xander, and tried taking out the world.  She went to magic rehab, sure, but she did not suffer direct consequences of her actions like the others.  For instance Anya--she killed a few frat boys, was hunted down by Buffy, stripped of her powers and then had to watch her best friend die to fix things.  What's the difference between Anya (I'm referencing her second go at being a vengeance demon--not the first time around) and Willow?  Sure, Anya was a demon, but they both chose to become what they did, and they both had their human souls. 
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 20 2008 05:15 am   #23Eowyn315
Joss Whedon and his writers wanted the series to be something that would leave the viewers with a sense of our real life problems. I am sure that most of us know friends and loved ones that have become addict to drugs or alcohol.
Yeah, but why'd they have to do it with Willow and an illogical metaphor? I mean, you have Xander, who has an actual history of alcoholism in his family, or Buffy, who, in her depression, would be ripe for a drinking problem. Or Dawn, whose shoplifting could turn into more serious problems like underage drinking, smoking, or drugs. Or hell, just focus on Willow's addiction to power and control, which has been hinted at previously. But instead, they choose something that's already well established (magic) and they change the metaphor. I wouldn't have had a problem with it if we hadn't been dealing with magic for four years now, in which it was never even hinted at that magic was an addictive substance. In fact, we already have a metaphor for magic - sex (see, um, any season four scene with Willow and Tara doing a spell?). But now it's not a metaphor for sex, now it's a metaphor for drugs, which is completely inconsistent, just so Joss and co can give us an after school special? Sorry, Joss, that's not good enough.

As for Willow, yeah, she got control of her magic by going to the coven and everything, but why is it that no one expected her to go to jail like Faith did/was expected to?
Because it wasn't Willow's fault - it was the bad magic's fault (which is another reason why I dislike that metaphor - it lets Willow off the hook). Faith had to go to jail because she was bad, and all the people she killed, she did it because she wanted to, not under the influence of anything else. Willow, on the other hand, was out of control because of the black magic, and therefore, what she did wasn't really her fault. She didn't need to be punished - all she needed was to learn how to control the magic, and then they wouldn't have to worry about her hurting people. Because Willow in her right mind never hurts people.

(That was mostly sarcasm, FYI...)

I don't think it has anything to do with being a top-tier Scooby. I think it has more to do with where they place the blame. Just like souled Angel and Spike aren't held responsible for what they did while soulless (they may hold themselves responsible, but Buffy doesn't), Willow's behavior is excused because of the bad black magic. Same with Anya - she turns human, and it's like she never even was a vengeance demon. Because they're not the same person they were when they committed the crimes, it doesn't matter to Buffy.

For the record, I don't think Willow lets herself off the hook so easily. It's pretty clear in season seven that her attitude toward magic is drastically changed. She knows that she has a responsibility in how she uses it, and she's very conscious of not wanting to hurt people. She didn't say, "Oh, well, I spent a summer in England and now I'm all better, so I can do what I want with magic again," even though it would have been really easy to do that, to become reckless and irresponsible again once she's away from the coven's watchful eye. Sometimes people don't need punishment in order to learn a lesson. And that's really what it's about - redemption and change, not punishment or suffering. It doesn't matter to Buffy how you get there, as long as you know that what you did was wrong, and you're going to be good from now on.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 20 2008 05:41 am   #24Eowyn315
She killed one guy on accident, some harmless demons, beat up a bunch of innocent people really badly, and killed that old man on purpose.
Uh... I think you're going a little easy on Faith, here. Don't forget that she also tried to frame Buffy for killing the Deputy Mayor, betrayed them all by siding with the Mayor - which essentially means she's helping to raise a demon that will kill everyone and destroy Sunnydale, while working for the Mayor she planned to kill both Buffy and Willow, and she tried to kill Angel. After she wakes up from her coma, she beats a woman unconscious, threatens Joyce, steals Buffy's body, tries to kill her, shoots Angel, tortures Wesley pretty horribly, and then tries to kill Angel before she gives in and admits she needs help.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 20 2008 06:13 am   #25Scarlet Ibis
I was giving the long and short of it--lump sums.  Either way, it still doesn't trump trying to kill all of your best friends (Willow was way closer to all of those people more than Faith ever was) and destroy the world.  Sunnydale's a blip on the map compared to billions of people world wide.  Also, Faith didn't need a dose of "good magic" to see the error of her ways. She was on a downward spiral and she knew it, and essentially tried to have herself destroyed ala Angel by trying to piss him off by attacking him and his people.  The end result was Faith caging herself, and serving her time.

But that wasn't my point--not punishment, and not just learning a valuable lesson at the end of the day or whatever.  Willow's change stemmed solely from her being dosed by magic--she did not arrive to this conclusion on her own, which to me, makes her situation a lot worse.  Not only did she royally screw up, she only changed by a catalyst of magic.  Her redemption was a cheat.

And that's really what it's about - redemption and change, not punishment or suffering. It doesn't matter to Buffy how you get there, as long as you know that what you did was wrong, and you're going to be good from now on.
But that's the point that was being made--the Scoobies essentially don't get punishment or suffering while the others do.  Sure there's redemption and change (some of the time for some of) the Scoobies, but why not the other half of that equation like the rest of them?  There isn't equal ground for lessons learned.  For instance--Anya didn't get an ultimatum from Buffy or a second chance, or a head start, or an option to fix it or what have you--even before when she saw it coming in "Lessons," she didn't pull Anya aside and tell her to chillax, cause she might have to deal with the Slayer real soon.  All Anya got was a sword in the chest, when compared to the others, isn't playing fair.  Whether or not Anya deserved it doesn't matter, but it's clear that the treatment she received was less than the others, proving there is a caste system of sorts there.

ETA: Also, there really isn't much difference between Dark Willow and Anyanka--both derived their powers by choice and by magic.  Willow's hair and eyes turn black, and her face is all veiny, and Anyanka has a wrinkly...other face.  I know--she's a demon.  But what does that really mean in her case?  She has the power to grant wishes, a funny other face, and a magical necklace from which her power derives.  She isn't imbued with a demon soul of some kind--it's a form of magic, just like Willow.  The only difference is it's bestowed upon her, and not self inflicted like Willow.  Someone like Dark Willow is clearly more than human, and to pretend she's just a regular girl hyped on crack magic, making her do bad things is absurd.  More importantly, it was all her choice.

Furthermore, since Buffy knows the source of Anya's power, why not just take it?  Destroy it?  Why go right to the killing (or attempting to kill)?
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 20 2008 12:10 pm   #26sosa lola

So in that sense, the Scoobies were not punished directly for what they had done, whereas the others were

Tara leaves Willow right after the spell in Tabula Rasa, which is considered a direct punishment. Xander doesn't get a second chance with Cordelia: direct punishment right after he had cheated - not to mention Cordelia's attempts later to make him feel jealous with Wesley and her spilling a few of his secrets about his family (Christmas and his father being out of job.) Buffy directly gets chided for wrong deeds like running away and hiding Angel's return from others.

Who are the others you're talking about? Anya gets away with all her murders after she becomes human, not to mention that Buffy gave her so many second chances before she had enough in Selfless: Anya had been granting wishes for months before Buffy decided to kill her. Spike got away with his betrayal with Adam, the Scoobies could have staked him by then, knowing that he's not really helpless after all, but they let him be. Tara casts a spell that went wrong to make the Scoobies blind to demons and they were almost killed, but she was forgiven right away.

The Scoobies are usually more forgiving toward others (and themselves of course), the times where they don't feel like forgiving someone is when this someone goes way out of line like Faith who swung to the evil side. Other than that, they had gave Spike a home and food when he needed it, even when they shouldn't have. They accepted Anya into the group and never threw her past in her face (except Willow for a few times). Even Faith was accepted with opened arms after she had framed Buffy with murder and molested and almost strangled Xander. They didn't send her to jail and they were there for her, but she chose  to betray them.

I was giving the long and short of it--lump sums. Either way, it still doesn't trump trying to kill all of your best friends (Willow was way closer to all of those people more than Faith ever was) and destroy the world. Sunnydale's a blip on the map compared to billions of people world wide. Also, Faith didn't need a dose of "good magic" to see the error of her ways. She was on a downward spiral and she knew it, and essentially tried to have herself destroyed ala Angel by trying to piss him off by attacking him and his people. The end result was Faith caging herself, and serving her time.

It took time for both Faith and Willow to come to their senses. Willow had told Giles in S7 that she should be killed or stripped off her magic. She did want a severe punishment, but Giles knew that she would be useful in the future and ending her life will cause the world more harm than help it. He could see the remorse and guilt in her, and that she'll work harder on being good.

Same with Faith, like I had said, she was the one who didn't want to be helped. The Scoobies did what they can to help her, but she chose evil. She realized she needed jail because it was the only way to help her become a better person.
 

Dec 20 2008 06:18 pm   #27Eowyn315
Willow's change stemmed solely from her being dosed by magic--she did not arrive to this conclusion on her own, which to me, makes her situation a lot worse.
Well, yeah, that makes sense when you consider that the first change (her turning evil) was also a product of magic. You may not agree with it, but the way it's presented is that Willow is no longer the same person - "Willow doesn't live here anymore." In her grief, she's been taken over by the black magic, and the "real Willow," the good Willow, doesn't have control. Once Giles doses her, and Xander manages to get through, she returns to her normal self. It's presented a lot more like the human/demon dichotomy than Faith, who goes evil with no supernatural influence.

But it's not like the white magic keeps her good forever. As we've seen, these magic "doses" wear off (Willow and Amy's withdrawal after going to see Rack), so eventually she does have to make the decision on her own. Every day after that, she has to make the decision not to give in to the black magic. Every day, she has to make responsible choices about using magic. Because just like Faith, she could very easily slip back into being evil, but she doesn't - she makes the choice to stay good.

the Scoobies essentially don't get punishment or suffering while the others do.
But Buffy's not the one meting out the punishment. D'Hoffryn is the one who makes Anya suffer - Buffy may have stabbed her, but D'Hoffryn took her powers, killed Halfrek, and sent hitmen after her. The demon is the one who makes Spike suffer through the trials - and which do you think was more important to Buffy? The fact that they suffered, or the fact that they made a choice to be good? I'm sure she feels bad about what they've gone through (or she would if Spike had told her about it), but I absolutely don't believe that she would say, "Well, since Spike and Anya suffered for what they did, Willow, we're going to have to stab you with hot pokers for a while, just so everything's fair."

Other than Faith, who is a special case because it was very personal for Buffy, Buffy usually isn't the one to punish people. Spike's choice to get a soul came with suffering, but he chose it anyway. Anya's choice to reverse the wish came with the loss of her powers and Halfrek's death, but she chose it anyway. Faith's choice to go to jail came with... well, being in jail, but she chose it anyway. It's not Willow's fault that her choice didn't involve a more severe punishment - as Sosa pointed out, she was willing to take it, even believed she deserved it. But she'd clearly made the effort to be good - was still making the effort every day all throughout season 7 - so there's no reason for Buffy or Giles or anyone to punish her when she's already learned her lesson.

All Anya got was a sword in the chest, when compared to the others, isn't playing fair.
How is that not fair? Anya lived with them and saw how Buffy worked for two whole years before she became a vengeance demon again. She knew she was taking a risk by staying in Sunnydale and continuing to grant wishes. She had to know that if she crossed the line, Buffy was going to come after her. In fact, Buffy had already come after her - in "Beneath You" - and let her off easy by only making her reverse the wish. So she DID get a second chance, and what did she do with it? Slaughtered an entire frat house.

Everybody gets second chances on this show. Everybody. The question is whether they take them or not.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 20 2008 08:37 pm   #28Scarlet Ibis
not to mention that Buffy gave her so many second chances before she had enough in Selfless: Anya had been granting wishes for months before Buffy decided to kill her.  
How is that not fair? Anya lived with them and saw how Buffy worked for two whole years before she became a vengeance demon again. She knew she was taking a risk by staying in Sunnydale and continuing to grant wishes. She had to know that if she crossed the line, Buffy was going to come after her.
Is it really considered a second chance if you didn't know there was a strike one?  We could all assume that Anya knew that Buffy would eventually come gunning for her, but the fact of the matter is, it's never stated until "Selfless."  Anya was still working with the team, helping them fight and find demons (the one that was skinning people comes to mind), so did she really know she was on the verge of becoming an enemy?  No, I don't think she did.  Anya felt remorse for what she did, but no one talked to her about it.  What she saw previously with the whole Willow incident, the Scoobies--Buffy in particular, were all about the talking her down after killings, and not about trying to destroy/kill her.  So being a "friend," maybe she thought she'd have the same courtesy of messing up, that she would get a good talk first, but she was wrong.

And again--Buffy knew where the source of Anya's power was, and she could have taken it away.  Anya wouldn't be able to hurt anyone then.  But the only option is to kill her for some reason.

Spike got away with his betrayal with Adam, the Scoobies could have staked him by then, knowing that he's not really helpless after all, but they let him be.
Yeah, but he saved them (Willow, Giles and Xander) from being slaughtered by a demon.  They were too out of it by the spell to defend themselves.  And when it comes to defending himself against humans, he was still helpless. After he's chipped, beyond the whole "manipulate the Scoobies" thing so that he could get the chip out, Spike doesn't do anything in s4 that would warrant him being a threat.  And again, if he hadn't orchestrated that whole Adam thing, chances are he wouldn't have been in the Initiative, and the Scoobies would have been dead.  Not to mention, him helping them fight their way out.

Tara casts a spell that went wrong to make the Scoobies blind to demons and they were almost killed, but she was forgiven right away.
That was an accident--she didn't purposely set out to harm anyone, and when she saw that she made a mistake, she quickly reversed it.  She was even willing to leave Sunnydale.  So for those reasons, that instance is totally irrelevant to what we're talking about.

The Scoobies are usually more forgiving toward others (and themselves of course), the times where they don't feel like forgiving someone is when this someone goes way out of line like Faith who swung to the evil side.
And Willow didn't? You don't think Willow's actions surpassed Faith's?  Willow chose to betray and attempted to kill her friends too, and what's more wrong about the scenario is that Willow was more of a friend than Faith ever was, making her betrayal that much greater.

Same with Faith, like I had said, she was the one who didn't want to be helped. The Scoobies did what they can to help her, but she chose evil. She realized she needed jail because it was the only way to help her become a better person.
Willow did not want to be helped either.  If Giles hadn't shown up and dosed her with that "good" coven magic, there's no way Xander would have been able to get through to her.  Faith needed time to come to her senses, while Willow needed magic.  So what does that say about the two of them?  That was Willow's personality driving--not some bad magic.  I'm not saying she should have been killed, but magic therapy was not the only therapy she needed, IMO.

In her grief, she's been taken over by the black magic, and the "real Willow," the good Willow, doesn't have control.
But Willow had to go and get the "black magic".  I'm talking about regular Willow.  She sought out that power to do what she wanted to do.  The magic didn't just like...seep into her skin from out of nowhere.  She goes to the Magic Shop and drains the books on purpose.  That was pure Willow, who made herself into Dark Willow.

But Buffy's not the one meting out the punishment.
When talking about punishment or consequences, I didn't mean that it all rested on Buffy's shoulders or that it should.  Faith's punishment was not left up to Buffy, Spike's atonement or whatever was not decided by Buffy, or Anya's...I'm saying that these people made the choice on their own.  Regardless of how long it took them to come to that conclusion, they all did it of their own volition, whereas initally Willow did not.  With Xander's spell debacle in OMWF, no one even talks about him never casting spells again.  His response is, "Gee, I didn't know what was going to happen," only when he did see what was going on, he didn't open up his mouth to say anything.  When they were all wondering if Buffy could defeat the musical demon or not, he didn't divulge the information he knew, which could have helped in some form or fashion.  At any rate, it couldn't have hurt.  It's played as a joke--big funny Xander makes a goof that kills a few folks, sure.  But a big, fat nothing happens there.  Not even a talk of some kind.  It was weird.  Not saying something horrible should have happened to him, but even Dawn gets a lecture for stealing, and is forced to work in the Magic Box.  Just something.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 20 2008 11:44 pm   #29Maggie
But it's not like the white magic keeps her good forever. As we've seen, these magic "doses" wear off (Willow and Amy's withdrawal after going to see Rack), so eventually she does have to make the decision on her own. Every day after that, she has to make the decision not to give in to the black magic. Every day, she has to make responsible choices about using magic. Because just like Faith, she could very easily slip back into being evil, but she doesn't - she makes the choice to stay good.

I actually see Willow as far more vulnerable to backsliding than Faith.  It took Faith a long while, but when she turned herself in, that was it.  She really didn't want to cross over the line again.  It was a moment of real honesty for her, seeing that she really was at rock bottom.  And I think actually submitting to the punishment was just a way of cementing in that fundamental choice she made.  And as we see in NFFY, Faith really really isn't close to going over.

By contrast, Willow is obvoiusly still dicey in B8.   She *might* be committed to the good.  She did go off to rehab, and she did have a lot of remorse.  But the magic-as-drugs metaphor maybe kept her from getting at the root of her problem, which would make her vulnerable to recidivism.  It's also possible that she'd see the White Goddess event as a big green light for her and forget that she always has to be cautious.  I don't want to make too much of it.  She clearly has more reservations than Buffy about some of the moves Buffy is making in B8.  She often does sound like a voice of moral restraint.  But we know she's been off with uber-goddesses and is resisting news about who she is and what she's to become; we know she's going to go dark eventually.  And her understanding of the Buffy-for-Tara trade of season 6 still strikes me as not fully honest with herself.  She didn't do the spell JUST to get Buffy back.  She dug the power.  And that's not in her current explanation for what happened there.

On other topics y'all have been discussing:  It's too easy to forget how much mercy Spike got in season 4.  The biggest act of clemency was when he didn't get staked after kidnapping Riley's doctor.  I tend to forget it, largely because it all seems much more like a plot device (we can't let Spike get staked now) than something real.  Sort of like I can't fully hold Xander accountable for the deaths in OMWF because the writers seem to mostly be using that as a plot device.   But for sure if you're going to say that Xander was responsible for a lot of deaths in season 6, then you've got to say that Spike got a LOT of mercy in season 4. 

I do think that the non-Scoobies get different treatment though.  It's not as stark as some have argued here.  And a lot of it just stems from the raw loyalty that the core four have to each other.  But there are a lot of places where it just looks bad. 
Dec 21 2008 12:43 pm   #30sosa lola

After he's chipped, beyond the whole "manipulate the Scoobies" thing so that he could get the chip out, Spike doesn't do anything in s4 that would warrant him being a threat.

How about when he kidnapped that doctor to get his chip out? The fact that Spike works on getting his chip out makes him more dangerous than the Scoobies realize. You say Spike did nothing, but he kept threatening them that he'll kill them if the chip stops working. That on its own should have made them more alert, but Giles still keeps blood in his fridge for Spike, Willow wants Spike to be sheltered after he tried to bite her, and Xander trusts Spike enough to deliver him military clothes when he needs them in The Yoko Factor.

And Willow didn't? You don't think Willow's actions surpassed Faith's? Willow chose to betray and attempted to kill her friends too, and what's more wrong about the scenario is that Willow was more of a friend than Faith ever was, making her betrayal that much greater.

While Willow was dark, Buffy was willing to fight her and kill her if it was needed to happen. Willow is stronger than Buffy, so Buffy wasn't able to defeat her. Same with Faith, no one wanted to kill her, they wanted to help her, but she kept choosing the Mayor. Buffy only wanted to kill her when Faith had poisoned Angel, and her blood was the way to save his life. Even when Faith had woken up from her coma, she caused the Scoobies harm. And from S4, when they had known her as evil, they get to meet her again in S7, and other than the first seconds of frowning at her, they welcomed her with open arms.

Willow did not want to be helped either.

She got a slap from Dawn and a shouting from Buffy, then Willow revealed that she needs help and from then on, she was very serious about being good until she lost Tara, and then it all went dark for her, she only wanted to kill those who caused them pain, especially Warren who killed Tara. She didn't intent to hurt her friends until they stood in her way. When Xander was able to reach for her, all the darkness disappeared, and Willow was Willow again. She felt great remorse and wanted to be punished for what she had done.

With Xander's spell debacle in OMWF, no one even talks about him never casting spells again.

I think this is mostly the fault of Joss. Xander was his choice because then he'll get to use the "Am I your Queen?" joke, he didn't care to make a big deal out of it.

But when talking characters, we've seen how Giles reacted to Xander doing the same thing in S2, "Get out of my face." Harsh and well-deserved, so why won't Xander get another yelling now? It's obvious how much he "annoys" Giles, so I can see a talk or even a yelling after the episode ends. I think Buffy's revelation that she was in heaven had stunned everybody, and that any talk or blame to put upon Xander was postponed. The only time I remember it was ever mentioned again was Older and Far Away, where Xander tells Dawn that sometimes they cast a spell they think is harmless and then realize that it's not. He was talking about what he had done and wanted Dawn to learn from his mistake.

By contrast, Willow is obvoiusly still dicey in B8.

I don't know about that. We haven't gotten all the details yet. I see Willow trying to learn more about her powers and using Snake Lady (forgot her name) to help Buffy. I even think Kennedy knows about her. But we have to wait before making a full judgment of it. To me, Willow appears much more level-headed than Buffy, who's drowning in her responsibilities-therefore making bad choices- and she's the voice of reason in most occasions. I actually believe she's the one who'll guide Buffy to the right path in the end of S8.

It's too easy to forget how much mercy Spike got in season 4.

I honestly agree. The Scoobies are not entitled to help him at all after all he had done to them, yet they take him in, feed him and save him from danger. They pay him for helping and I think Giles wanted to make a deal with him in The I In Team, that they could be a team, but Spike vulgarly refuses.

I tend to forget it, largely because it all seems much more like a plot device (we can't let Spike get staked now) than something real. Sort of like I can't fully hold Xander accountable for the deaths in OMWF because the writers seem to mostly be using that as a plot device.

Sadly, word.

I do think that the non-Scoobies get different treatment though. It's not as stark as some have argued here. And a lot of it just stems from the raw loyalty that the core four have to each other. But there are a lot of places where it just looks bad.

I actually prefer the Scoobies' loyalty to each other than how Angel's group react to friends' betrayal. I feel for Wesley when his friends cut him off from their lives without hearing his reasons for kidnapping Connor.

Friends make mistakes, some are very major, but true friendship is that that sticks through the bad times. After everything they went through, Buffy, Xander and Willow are still together fighting the good fight.

Dec 21 2008 06:56 pm   #31Scarlet Ibis
How about when he kidnapped that doctor to get his chip out? The fact that Spike works on getting his chip out makes him more dangerous than the Scoobies realize. You say Spike did nothing, but he kept threatening them that he'll kill them if the chip stops working.
Okay, I said season four in that statement.  But season five?  That was Spike's second attempt (and last) to ever get his chip out.  You'd think that someone like Buffy would have been smart enough to figure out he'd do that.  "Help me find Riley so I can help make him better," who he doesn't give a piss about, or use that same doctor to make him his old self again.  Who would hesitate to guess what Spike would choose?  And besides, it was a failed attempt, and he was still harmless, so Buffy couldn't stake him.  Smack him around or punch him, sure, but not stake.  If Spike was a true threat to his full potential, he would have gotten endless demons (or vampires) to go after Buffy and her people, seeing as how he knew where they all lived, or set their houses on fire, since that wouldn't affect his chip. 

Also, Spike didn't threaten to kill them all--Buffy sure, and I can only think of two times: "Something Blue," and quietly to himself in "Out of My Mind."  What times are you referring to?  He did say, "try to remember I hate you all" when Giles and Xander were looking for Faith, but that isn't threatening to kill them.  He does tell Riley in "Into the Woods" that if he wasn't chipped, he would have killed him long ago, but that's it.

Even when Faith had woken up from her coma, she caused the Scoobies harm. And from S4, when they had known her as evil, they get to meet her again in S7, and other than the first seconds of frowning at her, they welcomed her with open arms.
You forget that Buffy went after Faith in s4, planning to do...whatever it was she was going to do to Faith, and only didn't because Angel literally stepped in between them.  And s7--Buffy literally had her back against the wall, and since Faith was coming with a good report from Angel, saving him and everything, was the only reason she was more inclined to somewhat trust her.

She didn't intent to hurt her friends until they stood in her way. When Xander was able to reach for her, all the darkness disappeared, and Willow was Willow again.
That was what I was referencing when she didn't want help--when she was evil, and not high on crack magic earlier in the season.  And stand in her way?  How was Dawn standing in her way when she threatened to make her a green ball of energy again?  Or sending that big, explosive ball after Xander and Dawn just because Jonathan and Andrew were with them?  Why not teleport herself to them so she could see the two people she really wanted?  Willow didn't care.  And again--Xander only reached her because Giles dosed her.  That is the only reason.

I actually prefer the Scoobies' loyalty to each other than how Angel's group react to friends' betrayal. I feel for Wesley when his friends cut him off from their lives without hearing his reasons for kidnapping Connor.
While I agree that Wesley got some messed up treatment, we aren't talking about Angel's team.  In fact, when you think of it, they were more fair over there.  Angel was put in exile by his friends, as was Wesley, Connor, they cornered Cordy when she was dangerous, Gunn was given the cold shoulder till he sent himself to a hell dimension...It was all pretty even keeled over there, and re-earn trust for everyone--human or demon, and not on Buffy.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 23 2008 04:19 am   #32Eowyn315
Anya felt remorse for what she did, but no one talked to her about it.
Uh... actually, Willow DID try to talk to her first. She says she's there to help Anya, and Anya flat out rejects her help, insists the people she killed "got what they deserved," and throws Willow's own killing in her face, as though Anya has any room to lord anything over Willow after a thousand years of wreaking havoc as a vengeance demon.

Buffy knew where the source of Anya's power was, and she could have taken it away.
Yes, because Anya's just going to let Buffy walk up and take her pendant off and smash it. I'm pretty sure Buffy would've had to fight her for it anyway. Besides, what's to stop Anya from just going to D'Hoffryn and asking to become a vengeance demon again? If he welcomed her back after the wedding disaster, why not now? How many times is Buffy going to let Anya choose to be a demon before she says enough's enough?

Faith needed time to come to her senses, while Willow needed magic.
You also have to keep in mind that Willow didn't GET time to come to her senses. Those last four episodes take place in the span of, what? One day, maybe two? Faith was working on the side of evil for weeks before Buffy tried to take her out, and then once she came out of the coma, she went right back to doing bad things again, and it was several days before she finally admitted she needed help. But Willow was much more powerful, and thus capable of doing more damage in a much shorter amount of time, so they didn't exactly have the luxury of "let's just wait until she comes to her senses."

But when talking characters, we've seen how Giles reacted to Xander doing the same thing in S2, "Get out of my face." Harsh and well-deserved, so why won't Xander get another yelling now?
Maybe because Giles already had one foot out the door and had stopped paying attention to what the Scoobies were doing?

He did say, "try to remember I hate you all" when Giles and Xander were looking for Faith, but that isn't threatening to kill them.
Well, he also says, "I'll head out, find this girl, tell her exactly where all of you are, and then watch as she kills you." That's about as close as Spike can reasonably get to threatening to kill them - sending a psycho Slayer their way and letting her do the dirty work.

You forget that Buffy went after Faith in s4, planning to do...whatever it was she was going to do to Faith, and only didn't because Angel literally stepped in between them.
Uh, yeah... after Faith stole her body and tried to kill her, the last in a long list of things Faith has done to Buffy, her friends, and family. Exactly how many chances is Buffy supposed to give Faith?
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 23 2008 04:49 am   #33Scarlet Ibis
Uh... actually, Willow DID try to talk to her first. She says she's there to help Anya, and Anya flat out rejects her help, insists the people she killed "got what they deserved,"
Well, Buffy, being the demon the demon sheriff and Anya's "friend," did not talk to her.  Willow gave it a shot, but does the buck really stop there?  Certain cases, looks like.  And Anya's rejection for help initially?  That's called denial.  She was willing to sacrifice herself to make it right by the end of the day.

Yes, because Anya's just going to let Buffy walk up and take her pendant off and smash it. I'm pretty sure Buffy would've had to fight her for it anyway. Besides, what's to stop Anya from just going to D'Hoffryn and asking to become a vengeance demon again? If he welcomed her back after the wedding disaster, why not now?
Yes, just like Anya was going to let Buffy just walk up and kill her?  If she was going to walk up to her and do anything, it would have been tough.  So why not take her power away?  And D'Hoffyrn only asked her back because of the immense pain she was in.  If she lost her powers due to her own negligence like the first time around, he wouldn't have given it to her, which is why she was human again in the first place.

You also have to keep in mind that Willow didn't GET time to come to her senses.
Look, if Willow had been given any amount of time, a whole slew of people would have been dead--a lot more people than the number of people Faith killed over the years, in the span of days.

Uh, yeah... after Faith stole her body and tried to kill her, the last in a long list of things Faith has done to Buffy, her friends, and family. Exactly how many chances is Buffy supposed to give Faith?
Yeah, that statement had been in response to no one going after Faith or whatever.  And Faith didn't try to kill her--you can't try to kill someone if your intent is to steal their body.   In fact, Faith never directly tried to kill Buffy.  Was she going to watch Angelus do it and cheer him on?  Yes.  The Mayor once the ascension kicked off?  If she'd been awake, yes.  Season four rolled around, they traded blows, she took her body, they switched back, they traded blows some more, but she didn't try to kill her--she ran away.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 23 2008 12:36 pm   #34sosa lola
Maybe because Giles already had one foot out the door and had stopped paying attention to what the Scoobies were doing?

But Giles did have a talk with Willow about her challanging dark powers and bringing Buffy back. I can imagine some sort of talk with Xander about what he had done right after the singing was finished. It's the logical thing to happen.

The real problem is that we weren't meant to take what had happened seriously. Xander seemed to be randomly chosen just for the funny little joke. It was a plot-device that should be buried and forgotten.

I remember in one of the forums, fans started to write parodies in the episode's discussion thread about how Joss chose Xander to be the summoner. I only have one of them in my laptop:

the hero factor says:

Theory #418:

"Wait! Cut!" Joss yelled, waving his arms in the air. "Xander?" he muttered. "Is that right?"

He turned toward his crew and snapped his fingers.

"You there. Lackey. Bring me over a copy of the script."

The lackey trotted over, script in hand.

"Here you go, sir."

Joss grunted in what could have been interpreted as thanks and began flipping through the book. He stopped and scanned a page near the end.

"Well, would you look at that? Huh."

"Problem, sir?" Lackey asked.

"It's just, I could have sworn that it was the other one, um, the redhead..." Joss trailed off.

"Willow, you mean?"

"Yes! Willow!" Joss nodded. "Her whole storyline...whatever...is about using big magical gestures to try to make everything okay. Summoning Sweet was supposed to be a part of that."

"Hmm, that would make more sense, sir. Comparatively speaking."

"Yeah." Joss frowned. "I guess I got them mixed-up."

"Yes, well, when you abandon characterization and common sense in favor of turning the characters into nothing more than mouth-pieces for plot contrivences, such mistakes are easy to make."

"Yeah, I guess we'll have to be more careful about that in the future."

"Yes, sir." Lackey gestured to the set. "So, shall we reshoot?"

"I don't think that's necessary. I mean, if it were Giles, or even Dawn, then yeah, probably. But it's Xander. Like anyone really cares." Joss lifted the script and ran his finger under a line of text. "Besides, this 'be your queen' line takes on a whole new dimension of hilarity and butt-monkey-ness this way."

"Very funny, sir."

Joss sighed dreamily. "Even my mistakes are genius."


(LOL, I don't really like Joss to be mocked, but he had it coming. I don't mind having Xander summon Sweet as long as there'll be consequences and a talk about it, or a mention of a talk about it in the next episode.)
Dec 24 2008 03:32 am   #35nmcil
Bottom line for me is the series Big Good vs Big Bad equals finding your humanity and Season Six makes everything the extreme - falling down into the most horrible and darkest regions of your humanity.  The individual character story arcs may seem extreme and unjust when real life logic is applied but from my experience of life - Season Six reflects pretty much what a bitch life can really get down to.  Drug and alcohol addiction are horrendous, and people that fall victim to their addiction bring pain and suffering to themselves and their loved ones.  People do go insane like Willow does and go out murder and take their revenge.  Like Xander, people do cause great harm and are never made to answer for their actions, happens every single day.  And while having Willow go off to the The Coven instead of facing life in prison or official execution, getting us back to the Real World and Real People which what the series is all about, this makes sense in the metaphor of "finding the best of our humanity."  

The things these character did involve very complicated issues, even Xander's not ever being held accountable for the deaths he caused, and there is no question that he is responsible for people being kill, are a part of human societies.  The one incident that I have never been able to reconcile and find anything good to say about where the writers took their characters was in the Faith attempt murder by Buffy.  That is the one incident that I find utterly reprehensible and have never been able to figure out why Joss Whedon and the writers make their Prime Hero Model choose to willing murder another person.  Even the brutality of Buffy in the alley scene can be reconciled through the "mental aberrations caused by extreme trauma" and mythic metaphor, but this viewer will never find justification for the Faith Sacrifice scenario - A Total "Get Out Free Card."

” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 24 2008 05:16 am   #36RedRobin
I agree with you nmcil, Buffy's willingness to kill Faith was a big shock, especially with her emphasis on that line between kill and no-kill she has on humans. Going after Faith, even to save Angel's life, comes off as both reckless and very dark for me. It cast the Bangel relationship in a bad light, with Buffy forgoing her morals to attack another human being, as well as tarnishing the supposed "difference" between Buffy and Faith--if Buffy is a hero, how can she mirror Faith's actions? Faith kills her victims first as an accident, then for business, yet Buffy is prepared to kill her without labeling such an act as wrong.
Dec 24 2008 05:27 am   #37nmcil
Season Six "Big Bad"


” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 24 2008 03:26 pm   #38sosa lola

It cast the Bangel relationship in a bad light, with Buffy forgoing her morals to attack another human being, as well as tarnishing the supposed "difference" between Buffy and Faith--if Buffy is a hero, how can she mirror Faith's actions? Faith kills her victims first as an accident, then for business, yet Buffy is prepared to kill her without labeling such an act as wrong.

I think for Buffy it was more "Faith is the reason Angel is dying, she deserves to die to make him live." If Faith didn't shoot Angel with the poison, Buffy wouldn't even have considered her.

I agree nmcil, life is S6's big bad. All the characters had made mistakes and bad choices this season.

Dec 25 2008 06:45 am   #39nmcil
I have been listening to an audio lecture on the Medea Myth and the question of Medea; Motivations and Driving Forces.  Extreme interesting - one of the themes discussed in the human dynamics passions contrasted with intellect and moral applications.   In the lecture the professor speaks of  Medea being controlled by her passion which supersedes all her emotional and intellectual spheres.  Buffy also is taken over by her passion, taken to the same point that Medea reaches, killing of another human being - they very sad case with the Buffy writers is that they took this most profound human act and tied it together with that stupid line about nobody misses around with my boy friend.  As viewers we understand that Buffy is suppose to be motivated by her need to save Angel, but I truly think this was one of the most "botched up" story plots of the entire series, and from my perspective, it was the mishandled of all.  Perhaps their thinking was that, like Spike and the rape attempt, Buffy willing to kill another human being is the major set-up for breaking Bangel apart. 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 25 2008 08:45 am   #40sosa lola
Buffy willing to kill another human being is the major set-up for breaking Bangel apart.

You have to put in mind that this human being Buffy was going to kill was the one who sent Angel to his slow death. Faith had done so much at this point to drive Buffy to make this decision. She had betrayed them, almost killed Xander, kidnapped Willow and now she gave Angel the poison. The show had acknowledged the seriousness of Buffy's attempt to kill Faith with Xander being the voice of reason, he had warned her that after this kill, he might lose her. I think by this point, Buffy had it with being the nice, stable, sacrificing girl while Faith was roaming around recklessly killing and torturing whoever she wanted and Buffy had to let her go just because she was human. Not to mention that it was either Buffy and Faith who can save Angel. Since Faith was the one to cause Angel's slow death, she was the one who should suffer for it.

By S6, Buffy seemed to learn from that lesson. Warren had killed Tara, but killing him wasn't Buffy's choice to decide. It was the police's.
Dec 26 2008 06:33 am   #41nmcil

From my perspective, Buffy's motivation and moral choice is clear - saving the life of "my boy friend" by taking the life of another human being.  Faith's history is, IMO, not part of the ethical consideration - Buffy's motivation was to save Angel by the sacrifice of Faith for her blood.  Buffy is working from extreme passion, Eros out of control.  Her moral "high ground" choice would have been to offer her own life and Slayer Blood - not as the last resort and from her failure to bring in Faith, but as the first choice. 

This is another one of those themes that viewers have very set ideas about  - agree to respectfully disagree with individual POV.

” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 26 2008 06:56 am   #42Scarlet Ibis
Her moral "high ground" choice would have been to offer her own life and Slayer Blood - not as the last resort and from her failure to bring in Faith, but as the first choice.
I think the biggest problem here is that Buffy's actions did not totally add up to what she was trying to achieve.  She picks a fight, which was not necessary, and then stabs Faith in the gut, which defeats the purpose entirely of saving her blood to help cure Angel.  Stabbing is brutal, and very intimate.  She looks cold and closed off when she does it.  From a hero stand point, Buffy is not supposed to portray the ideal of "eye for an eye," which I think a lot of viewers take issue with.  I don't personally--thematically, the fight scene is needed.  However, the stabbing is not.  If she really wanted Faith to save Angel, she could have simply slipped in, and shot Faith with one of Oz's tranq's and been done with it.  And not only that, Faith probably wouldn't even have had to die in order to save him.  Her stabbing of Faith was more about revenge than saving Angel.  His sickness was just a reason for her to go after her. 

Not only that, Faith's mistrust and switch to the dark side only provokes a reaction from Buffy when it involves Angel, which I'm sure people also take issue with.  She does nothing when she beats up (okay--manhandles) Willow, and has the desire to kill her, attempting to kill Xander (though admittedly, she seemed to be rehabilitating shortly after), or when she was after Buffy specifically with the failed Angelus resurrection.  The whole thing just seems very...dicey.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Dec 26 2008 08:50 am   #43sosa lola
From my perspective, Buffy's motivation and moral choice is clear - saving the life of "my boy friend" by taking the life of another human being. Faith's history is, IMO, not part of the ethical consideration - Buffy's motivation was to save Angel by the sacrifice of Faith for her blood. Buffy is working from extreme passion, Eros out of control. Her moral "high ground" choice would have been to offer her own life and Slayer Blood - not as the last resort and from her failure to bring in Faith, but as the first choice.

Do you honestly believe that Buffy would just go after Faith if Angel was hurt by someone else? Personally, I don't. I think she'd have offered herself if Faith was innocent from it, but Faith wasn't. Faith had to pay for what she had done to Angel. I think this is what was going on in her mind at that point.
Dec 27 2008 05:43 am   #44nmcil
Do you honestly believe that Buffy would just go after Faith if Angel was hurt by someone else?

Now that's an very interesting question - this would have put her in the position of having to save Angel, which she did, by offering her own life as sacrifice - But if going after Faith as revenge or payback - No Way.  Just look at what happened in LA this Christmas and the revenge or payback with  Buffy in the position of judge, jury, and  executioner of action.  If Buffy reflects, as I believe it does, the culture and society of the real world, she is not justified in going after Faith to save Angel. 

While it makes a great dramatic part of the episode and a necessary plot device to remove Faith from the series (at least temporarily) and to get Buffy as the savior/sacrificial character - it brings in a lot of questions about the role model of their heroine.

Don't mean to highjack the thread -
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dec 28 2008 12:11 am   #45Eowyn315
Well, Buffy, being the demon the demon sheriff and Anya's "friend," did not talk to her.
So, an offer for help is only good if it comes from Buffy? Do you honestly think Anya would have reacted any differently to her? I sincerely doubt that Willow told them what Anya did without mentioning that she tried to talk to her first. And while it may be obvious to us as viewers that Anya was in denial, we're also privy to a lot more of Anya's private moments than Willow was. To her, it just looked like Anya was an unrepentant killer, which is why she brought it to Buffy's attention.

And quite frankly, Anya's response to both Buffy and Xander when they show up isn't exactly that of someone who wants help. She's not at all surprised when Xander says Buffy is going to kill her. She expected it; she knew it would eventually come to this, which leads me to believe that she was NOT under the impression that she'd get mercy just because she helped them out or used to be a Scooby. And it's as if she wants a fight - she won't let Xander talk her down or stand in the way, and she meets Buffy head-on. Maybe she's going for suicide by slayer, although she fights back pretty well for someone trying to get killed. Either way, I think it's pretty obvious to us that she's screwed up and needs help, but to the people actually in the room with her, she probably seems like a belligerent, unrepentent demon who's killed a dozen people, and has no qualms about doing it again. Up until she tells D'Hoffryn she wants to reverse the wish, does she give any indication that she feels bad about what she did? Does she give Buffy a single reason why Buffy shouldn't kill her? I don't think she does.

Yes, just like Anya was going to let Buffy just walk up and kill her? If she was going to walk up to her and do anything, it would have been tough. So why not take her power away?
Probably because it would be pretty hard to get her pendant away from her without killing her. I take Buffy at her word here when she says it's not easy for her - when has it ever been easy for her to kill someone? - and I do think she's spent a lot of time considering her options, ever since they found out Anya was a demon again. She's always known this might be a possibility, and I think she's been cutting Anya slack by not going after her until now. If she thought it was as easy as yanking the pendant off Anya's neck and smashing it, I think she would have done that. (Keep in mind that she has no idea Giles did that in the Wishverse. It probably seems obvious to us, since we've seen it happen, but the characters don't have that luxury.)

Look, if Willow had been given any amount of time, a whole slew of people would have been dead--a lot more people than the number of people Faith killed over the years, in the span of days.
Okey-doke, I'm not gonna argue this one anymore, since I don't think it's really possible to compare Willow and Faith's situations with so many differences between them. The fact is, Buffy and the others deal with each situation as best they can, and sometimes that means putting a stop to their actions before you deal with their emotional state. That doesn't mean Willow was any less repentant than Faith was once they made the decision to be good. (And yes, Willow DID make a decision to be good - she could've tapped into that black magic again at anytime, but she chose to be responsible and use magic wisely.)

Perhaps their thinking was that, like Spike and the rape attempt, Buffy willing to kill another human being is the major set-up for breaking Bangel apart.
I completely disagree. First of all, the set up for breaking Bangel apart had already happened - in fact, the actual break-up had already happened in "The Prom." Angel is already planning to leave Buffy, and Buffy knows this when she tries to save him. Second of all, the reason for their break-up has nothing to do with Buffy being willing to kill Faith. Angel wants to leave Buffy because he can't give her the normal life she deserves. Leaving aside the fact that Buffy will never have a normal life, Angel leaves because he wants to do what's best for Buffy. Faith doesn't play into that at all.

I don't personally--thematically, the fight scene is needed. However, the stabbing is not.
Actually, I think the stabbing IS supposed to be significant. Buffy stabs Faith with her own knife - the knife the Mayor gave her. The weapon has significance to both Faith and the Mayor (it's Buffy's taunting Snake-Mayor with it that gets him hooked into their plan), so its reappearance here was done deliberately. If they didn't need the knife to make an appearance, Buffy could've tried to take down Faith in any number of more logical ways.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Dec 28 2008 02:55 am   #46nmcil
Perhaps their thinking was that, like Spike and the rape attempt, Buffy willing to kill another human being is the major set-up for breaking Bangel apart.

Let me clarify what I was thinking - for me the most significant action that comes out of the Buffy-Angel relationship, and one that in my POV is a clear indication of how this was not a good relationship for Buffy is her wanting to use Faith as a sacrifice to cure Angel.  That the plot device with  Faith's knife to incite the rage of The Mayor is needed for the finale and their fight is part of that arc - the actions of the prime heroine are a vital part of the story.  I am not fascinated by the fact that Buffy saves Angel and offers her own blood - much greater interest for the character is that her first choice.  

You are correct that the breakup of Buffy-Angel has already been established but in my perspective, this stabbing of Faith is the final and most important "life choice" indicator that this was not a good relationship.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.