BSV Forum - General - Episode Discussions
Where the Wild Things AreOkay, this is not a happy Spuffy episode. If you hate Riley, well, you'll still hate Riley at the end of this. I almost was going to skip over this, but I remembered Spike was in it.
Spike frightening Anya - Spike is really scraping bottom here, scaring people into giving him money. Anya points out that he's lost his vampire face and he doesn't even realize it. For somebody who was the Big Bad for a century, it sure disappears fast. I guess that's the way it goes in TV land (although Buffy's S6 depression seemed to last 4 EVA.)
Spike and Anya in the Bronze - foreshadowing their future crash together. They're very funny together and I just can't help thinking, Jeesh why is Anya hanging out with Xander? She could certainly do better.
Hostile 17 - Xander tries to get Spike in trouble with the Initiative soldiers, but apparently they no longer give a damn about Hostile 17. Riley certainly knows who he is and where to find him, but does nothing. (Possibly it's the threat of an old-fashioned butt kicking from his girlfriend, Buffy, that holds him back.) I guess the theory here is that Spike has changed enough that the soldier boys no longer recognize him as a threat. Which makes no sense. Whatever.
Xander and Anya's fight at the party - this is a mini version of their S6 storyline and includes Xander's jealousy of (or for?) Spike, the threat that their relationship is ending, the beginning of the vengeance. Nicely done.
Spike in the dental chair - there's a METAPHOR in here somewhere. Being good is like pulling teeth? When the poltergeist gets going, Spike is strapped in. Good against his will? If only.
Buffy and poltergeist - that little sex bunny Buffy can really stir up the nasty ghosties can't she? There are some vague similarities with I Only Have Eyes. Without the good dialog and the good angsty David and Sarah acting that is. It's the writers own fault for letting Riley come to town. Yes, I'm thinking if only it had been Spike, but probably just as well that it wasn't since the two of them would have burned the house down instead of just the living room rug.
Spike volunteers to Save Buffy - Fortunately, he gets a grip on himself and leaves. Spike's changing but there's a limit to do gooding.
While this episode pretends to be about Buffy and the Big Oaf, it's really about Spike and how his changes are beginning. He's "brought" to the "party" even though it's dangerous and he finds he fits in.
The title of course refers to the children's story where Max, a naughty boy, gets sent to bed without supper and goes to an imaginary world where wild animals live and becomes king. Here, Buffy gets sent to bed and becomes a wild animal (just like Spike says later). Foreshadow Normal Again. Is Buffy living in an imaginary world. So it seems.
Kathleen
XANDER: (looks up) Is that what this is about? We've gone other nights without sex.
ANYA: (angry) I know. Twice! I can't believe we're breaking up.
XANDER: Breaking- We're not! Are we?
ANYA: Of course we are. You, you've obviously grown tired of me. I mean, I've seen it happen to thousands of women over the centuries, I just never thought it would happen to me.
XANDER: Anya, there's a lot more to you and me than the sex. (Anya rolls her eyes) Well, there should be! I mean, a relationship is something that you work at. Work through. Together.
It's interesting that it was Xander, the male, who was talking about working through a relationship. Usually it's women who want more and men only caring about sex, but in two occasions in S4 we see Xander talking about having a connection and for their relationship to have meaning. I guess after he was burned with Faith, he doesn't want another meaningless sexual relationship again.
Sex sex sex - I thought this show was about Spike's development but it was really about sex and the way sex interferes with growing up. Who's getting it, who isn't, who's letting it take over their life while they neglect their responsiblities, who feels it's more important than anything else. Poor Spike doesn't get laid, but he does make a little progress.
I both dislike and like this episode - All that sex that is hiding the Inner Monsters that they are trying so hard to hide from and deny. Jonathan's important message to Buffy seems not to have made any lasting impression. When last we saw them in were doing sex instead of the important thing, talking about their deep insecurities, fears, and past history. All these characters are already on the paths that will lead them into the wild woods where they will all get lost or be strangled by their fears and fantasies.
Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
I think the height difference definitely has something to do with it. Yup...it's like they Don't. Fit. And nothing that they do makes them fit or hot or interesting.
Hell, I'm grimacing now just thinking about it, lol.
I don't know what it is about...not even Blucas, I don't think, cause I've seen him in other stuff, but there is just something about Riley that disgusts me when it comes to anything remotely sexual. Even if it's just an innuendo.
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
I just finished watching the episode and there are so many really important foreshadows and messages about Buffy-Riley and Xander-Anya. I think this is really a very interesting episode. Even something as simple as the transition from the scenes with Spike at the frat house party to the song that Giles sings and how they apply to Spike and Giles and the theme of distance and hidden emotional pain that these two characters experience with the Buffy-Riley relationship. The Song "Behind Blue Eyes" is also perfect for Spike and the plot of "The Yoko Factor." We see the going away from the father figure and taking up with the replacement in the school talking scene when they are talking about going to the party instead of following the instructions from Giles. It's interesting to see again how Willow plays such a strong supportive role for the Buffy-Riley relationship.
Everything about this episode shows the coming collapse of Buffy-Riley – I think it’s a wonderful continuation from "Super Star" and the fantasy world theme.
From the start we see the fundamental problem that is facing Buffy and Riley, the disparity of their physical strengths and the Super Enhanced Riley vs. Mr. Joe Normal. We see them both so satisfied with their ability to work together – they are equals and they are physical, but what they are not is capable of dealing honestly with each other when all the crap hits the fan. I love how that little line from Giles is casually dropped in about the evil energy could be coming from the underground Initiative facility, which of course is Adam and the evil that the humans are doing.
Buffy and Riley are all about the "touchy feely" primal sex, self-absorbed and ignoring all else - one of the most powerful and revealing scenes about Buffy’s disregard of important events now is the "Willow in danger, does not matter." – it plays perfectly off the earlier scene when Xander is talking about the trouble he and Anya are having, she hears nothing regarding her friend’s love problem, but she does hear about something as unimportant as her borrowed sweater.
For all the symbolism and references of sexual consummation of love, what we are shown is the metaphor of the energy force manifesting in the wall. Walls that separate and hide all those inner demons and monsters that Xander, Anya, Buffy and Riley are hiding and that will destroy their relationships. Everything is on the surface with these two couples and all the ugly fears and insecurities are in hiding.
Spike and Anya, you have to love their scenes together and how totally clueless Anya can be, Spike’s reaction when he finds out she takes him to the Initiative house is just wonderful, James Marsters is so perfect with his interpretation of Spike.
I loved their reminiscing about their lost powers - how they could so easily have done evil in their former state. Was nice to see how Anya really loves Xander and does not want to hurt him. Spike’s line about his love and how it ended badly was another one of those great lines that just slips in. He with his crazy vampire logic will pretend to stake Dru, but it won’t be out of vengeance, but out of love for Buffy. Great foreshadow for all the tragic future of "Entropy" between Xander, Anya and Spike.
Lots more things that I liked about this episode, but this post is too long and rambling as is.
Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Their 'acting' is very obvious and very forced too. When you consider their disparate sizes, if you watch the scene when they're supposed actually having sex, they're face to face which means his... relevant part... is down around her knees somewhere!
No chemistry is right - and very indicative of how uncomfortable their relationship becomes.
Hahaha, you crack me up. All4Spike. I couldn't have put it better!
And, Nmcil, please keep rambling. I love your insights.
All4Spike. You are so right!<--- points at icon...They were the perfec size for each other so we know exactly where his...ahem...spike.. is.


I am upper management.
Link to large original image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nmcil/4482999868/sizes/o/

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
I am upper management.
Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
I'd have to say it's James--the man who made caressing crypt doors hot

https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
This episode really foreshadow vital changes that were coming for all the characters - but especially with the couples.
Xander's line about "if we grow old together" is a huge red flag and wonderful foreshadow was Giles singing "Behind Blue Eyes." it fits perfect for "The Yoko Factor" and for the Spike-Buffy relationship.
Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
large size: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nmcil/4484877162/sizes/o/ (biley)
large size: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2748/4484245543_241cd09ff7.jpg (spuffy)


Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
I am upper management.
Can you imagine Riley doing the crypt door scene?. HAHAHA. OMG LMAO!
Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
I haven't laughed this hard in days.
I hate to sound like a whinger but I'd really appreciate it if we could keep these fun episode discussions free of any mention of the Season 8 comics. I followed the forums for a little while until they made me feel sicker and sicker, and I now avoid them like the plague. This is my river nile refuge from the nightmare going on everywhere else and it would be such a shame to lose it. What do you think? I'll start checking it regular again when I get around to buying a paid account.
Marc is listed on IMDB as 6'2". Sarah's long known as 5'3" without shoes. 'Course, they frequently had the girls in 4" heels unless their feet wouldn't be showing at all in the scene. (Then they wore slippers.) Alyson had it lucky for a long time because Willow only wore tennis shoes until she was supposed to look cooler once she started dating Tara and expanding her powers.
My ex used to make me stand on the couch. lolI am upper management.
Back in the day, there was an actor (Alan Ladd) who was quite short. He used to stand on boxes for love scenes so that his leading ladies wouldn't be taller that he was. Have no idea how they handled the scenes where you could see both of them at the same time from a distance. I just remember reading about the box thing.
I am upper management.
That Alan Ladd thing is pretty funny, and he was very short, only 5'4" according to IMDB. Wonder how accurate they are?
"Can you imagine Riley doing the crypt door scene?."
<--is miffed there is no vomit smiley.
Well wait--that could be hysterical too, in a most painful sort of way...
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
<-- Maybe that one works for you scarlet. lol Scarlet if you don't mind my asking, how tall are you? Cause I know you've met James at cons, is he taller or shorter than you? If you say he's 5'9" I'm gonna believe you, cause after all you've stood next to hisself.
So many people say he's 5'7", which I find totally unbelievable. ETA - Scarlett makes a good point about the boots. They definitely add to his height, which would help him a lot in face to face encounters with most people.
I am upper management.

I'm 5'11", and I know just how much I have to scooch down for a photo, lol.
The shoes I've seen James wear in RL weren't nearly as big and clunky as the combat boots were, and don't add much of anything to his height. If he ever wore K-Swiss, he'd have an extra inch inconspicuously, but I don't think he's discovered that brand just yet
Lately, he's been wearing Chuck Taylors, which have very thin soles. So yeah, I stick with my assessment of 5'9".https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Nice for me since I'm 5'4". 
They put lifts in Spike's boots in season 2 when he was working around David all the time and playing a villain. Those boots themselves didn't have much of a heel (you can see in the promo shots). But I don't think he kept them (especially because he did get a new pair of boots eventually) when compared to standing with Sarah in wide shots. On AtS, they didn't seem to care, since he wasn't playing a villain anymore. (Amy Acker is 5'8", btw.)
Desi Arnaz did the same thing

https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
He hsa so much screen presence I don't even think about his height. He fills the screen.
I am upper management.
Alan Ladd - I think for outdoor shots that made the girl or others stand in a little ditch. And of course, Alan almost always wore a hat - fedora or cowboy depending. Humphrey Bogart was short too, but somehow it didn't seem to matter so much.
Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.






















































































